Author Archives: hbcumoney

2023’s African America Household Portfolio Creeps Towards $7 Trillion In Assets

At the end of 2023, African America had asset values totaling $6.54 trillion and liability values totaling $1.55 trillion. This is an increase of $330 billion and $40 billion, respectively. Below is a breakdown of that wealth by assets and liabilities as reported by the Federal Reserve’s Distribution of Household Wealth data. African American assets amounted to 4% of U.S. Household and African American liabilities amounted to 8.3% of U.S. Household liabilities. This is a 100 basis points decline in assets from 2022 and 50 basis points decline in liabilities from 2022.

HBCU Money took a look at what exactly the African American asset portfolio entailed. African Americans are highly concentrated in two main areas, real estate and retirement accounts (pensions and 401K), respectively. These two groups comprise over 70 percent of African American assets versus only 43 percent for European Americans. Corporate equities/mutual funds and private business ownership comprise a staggering 35.3 percent of European American assets versus only 9.2 percent for African Americans, these two categories also representing African America’s lowest asset holdings.

Examining where African America puts its money and theorizing why can give us insight into strategies that can help in closing both household and institutional wealth gaps.

ASSETS

Real estate – $2.24 trillion

Definition: Real estate is defined as the land and any permanent structures, like a home, or improvements attached to the land, whether natural or man-made.

% of African America’s Assets – 34.3%

% of U.S. Household Real Estate Assets – 5.0%

4.2% increase from 2022

Consumer durable goods – $570 billion (3.6% increase from 2022)

Definition: Consumer durables, also known as durable goods, are a category of consumer goods that do not wear out quickly and therefore do not have to be purchased frequently. They are part of core retail sales data and are considered durable because they last for at least three years, as the U.S. Department of Commerce defines. Examples include large and small appliances, consumer electronics, furniture, and furnishings.

% of African America’s Assets – 8.7%

% of U.S. Household Assets – 7.2%

3.6% increase from 2022

Corporate equities and mutual fund shares – $270 billion

Definition: A stock, also known as equity, is a security that represents the ownership of a fraction of the issuing corporation. Units of stock are called “shares” which entitles the owner to a proportion of the corporation’s assets and profits equal to how much stock they own. A mutual fund is a pooled collection of assets that invests in stocks, bonds, and other securities.

% of African America’s Assets – 4.3%

% of U.S. Household Assets – 0.7%

17.4% increase from 2022

Defined benefit pension entitlements – $1.66 trillion

Definition: Defined-benefit plans provide eligible employees with guaranteed income for life when they retire. Employers guarantee a specific retirement benefit amount for each participant based on factors such as the employee’s salary and years of service.

% of African America’s Assets – 25.4%

% of U.S. Household Assets – 9.5%

3.1% increase from 2022

Defined contribution pension entitlements – $730 billion

Definition: Defined-contribution plans are funded primarily by the employee. The most common type of defined-contribution plan is a 401(k). Participants can elect to defer a portion of their gross salary via a pre-tax payroll deduction. The company may match the contribution if it chooses, up to a limit it sets.

% of African America’s Assets – 11.2%

% of U.S. Household Assets – 5.6%

21.7% increase from 2022

Private businesses – $330 billion

Definition: A private company is a firm held under private ownership. Private companies may issue stock and have shareholders, but their shares do not trade on public exchanges and are not issued through an initial public offering (IPO). As a result, private firms do not need to meet the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) strict filing requirements for public companies.1 In general, the shares of these businesses are less liquid, and their valuations are more difficult to determine.

% of African America’s Assets – 5.0%

% of U.S. Household Assets – 2.1%

5.7% decrease from 2022

Other assets – $740 billion

Definition: Alternative investments can include private equity or venture capital, hedge funds, managed futures, art and antiques, commodities, and derivatives contracts.

% of African America’s Assets – 11.3%

% of U.S. Household Assets – 2.7%

2.8% increase from 2022

LIABILITIES

Home Mortgages – $770 billion

Definition: Debt secured by either a mortgage or deed of trust on real property, such as a house and land. Foreclosure and sale of the property is a remedy available to the lender. Mortgage debt is a debt that was voluntarily incurred by the owner of the property, either for purchase of the property or at a later point, such as with a home equity line of credit.

% of African America’s Liabilities – 50.3%

% of U.S. Household Liabilities – 6.0%

1.3% increase from 2022

Consumer Credit – $710 billion

Definition: Consumer credit, or consumer debt, is personal debt taken on to purchase goods and services. Although any type of personal loan could be labeled consumer credit, the term is more often used to describe unsecured debt of smaller amounts. A credit card is one type of consumer credit in finance, but a mortgage is not considered consumer credit because it is backed with the property as collateral. 

% of African America’s Liabilities – 47.7%

% of U.S. Household Liabilities – 14.8%

4.2% increase from 2022

Other Liabilities – $30 billion

Definition: For most households, liabilities will include taxes due, bills that must be paid, rent or mortgage payments, loan interest and principal due, and so on. If you are pre-paid for performing work or a service, the work owed may also be construed as a liability.

% of African America’s Liabilities – 1.9%

% of U.S. Household Liabilities – 2.7%

0.0 nonchange from 2022

Source: Federal Reserve

The Only African American Owned Bank In Texas Selects Morris Brown College Alum As Its Next CEO

Unity National Bank, headquartered in Houston, Texas, with $209 million in assets, is the eighth largest African American owned bank by assets. It is located just a stone’s throw away from Texas Southern University. Recently the bank named Pedro Bryant, a Morris Brown College alum, its new CEO and President. Unity National Bank has an immense opportunity to move up the rankings for African American banks with the right strategy. According to an Apartment List report in February 2024, San Antonio, Houston, Dallas, and Austin rank as the third, fourth, sixth, and seventh best cities in the US for African American professionals. Lendio also reports that Texas is home to over 400,000 African American owned businesses and almost 13,000 are employer firms. These ingredients mean that with Unity National Bank being the only African American owned bank in the state the runway for growth is theirs to capture. This also means a strengthening of ties between HBCUs and the African America private sector are that much stronger. The lack of cohesion between the two institutions (100 HBCUs and 16 African American owned banks) has largely been one of the key ingredients holding back the African American economy as intellectual and economic capital rarely circulates between HBCUs and the African American owned employer firms.

Unity National Bank’s Full Press Release:

HBCU Money™ Histronomics: New Mexico’s 1st African American Town Was Founded By An HBCU Couple In 1903

“Up, you mighty race, accomplish what you will.” – Marcus Garvey

“Frank attended Morehouse College and Fisk University. While in school he learned about homesteading and its requirements. While working as a teacher in Georgia, he married Ella Louise McGruder. Ella was also a well-educated teacher, a graduate from the Haines Institute.

After he was threatened by the Ku Klux Klan, Frank’s father encouraged him to move West. Frank’s father was a Buffalo Soldier during the Mexican-American War. As a child he heard stories about New Mexico from his father. Boyer and two of his students traveled to New Mexico Territory in 1896. He arrived in the Pecos River Valley in 1898 near the community of Roswell, where he worked in the courts. In 1901 Ella and their four children joined him in New Mexico.” – National Park Service

New Mexico jointed the United States as the 47th state in the United States on January 6, 1912. It is currently home to approximately 2.1 million people with almost 40,000 African Americans across the state’s population. In 1999, the state established the Office of African American Affairs that has been tasked with assisting the interests of the state’s African American population. Blackdom’s legacy is still profound among the residents of the state and still signifies the power of building institutions and community that look to empower people of African descent. New Mexico PBS in 2010 produced a documentary detailing the story of a time not so long ago and the impact it still carries today. The story of how an HBCU couple changed the landscape of the Southwest forever and added to the rich history of African Americans place throughout.

African America’s July 2024 Jobs Report – 6.3%

OVERALL UNEMPLOYMENT: 4.3%

AFRICAN AMERICA: 6.3%

LATINO AMERICA: 5.3%

EUROPEAN AMERICA: 3.8%

ASIAN AMERICA: 3.7%

Analysis: European Americans unemployment rate rose 30 basis points in their unemployment rate. Asian Americans decreased 40 basis points and Latino Americans similarly increased 40 basis points from July, respectively. African Americans for a second straight month had no change in their unemployment rate.

AFRICAN AMERICAN UNEMPLOYMENT RATE BY GENDER & AGE

AFRICAN AMERICAN MEN: 6.6%

AFRICAN AMERICAN WOMEN: 5.5% 

AFRICAN AMERICAN TEENAGERS: 13.1%

AFRICAN AMERICAN PARTICIPATION BY GENDER & AGE

AFRICAN AMERICAN MEN: 69.7%

AFRICAN AMERICAN WOMEN: 63.0%

AFRICAN AMERICAN TEENAGERS: 27.6%

Analysis: African American Men saw an increase in their unemployment rate by 50 basis points and African American Women decreased by 20 basis points. African American Men increased their participation rate in July by 60 basis points. African American Women decreased in their participation rate in July by 70 basis points. African American Teenagers unemployment rate decreased by a volatile 380 basis points. African American Teenagers saw their participation rate decrease by 170 basis points in July, they are now at their lowest participation rate in the past five months for the second straight month.

African American Men-Women Job Gap: African American Women currently have 747,000 more jobs than African American Men in July. This is an increase from 646,000 in June.

CONCLUSION: The overall economy added 114,000 jobs in July while African America added 169,000 jobs. In a rarity, African America added more jobs than the overall economy meaning other groups took losses. From Barrons, “Government data on Friday showed a smaller-than-expected gain of 114,000 nonfarm payrolls last month, as the unemployment rate ticked up to 4.3%—a nearly three-year high. The figure likely puts more pressure on the Federal Reserve: The central bank has kept interest rates elevated to bring down inflation, but also must manage the other side of its dual mandate, which is to pursue maximum employment.”

SKYNET: The Perfect Economist?

“If A Machine, A Terminator, Can Learn The Value Of Human Life, Maybe We Can, Too.” – Sarah Connor

Pictured: Central Bank Chairs of Earth, United States, China, and Nigeria (clockwise)

By William A. Foster, IV

I know that any commentary involving Skynet evokes an absolute sense of dystopia, but perhaps what it was given control of was more the problem than giving it control. Instead of giving it control over our weapons of mass destruction, we instead gave it control over our systems of resources that usually lead to the use of those weapons. The chief economist of the Earth’s resources. What is economics though? There seems to be what we as economist know it to be, there is what those outside of the world of economics believe it to be, and unfortunately those two often are a world apart. According to the American Economic Association, “Economics can be defined in a few different ways. It’s the study of scarcity, the study of how people use resources and respond to incentives, or the study of decision-making. It often involves topics like wealth and finance, but it’s not all about money. Economics is a broad discipline that helps us understand historical trends, interpret today’s headlines, and make predictions about the coming years.” To put it a bit more bluntly, economics explores the use of resources – and everything is a resource. How teachers use their time is a resource, the availability of insurance is a resource, what happens when there are subsidies for renewable energy is a resource, so on and so forth. Economics constantly is exploring what happens when resources interact with each other and the people and/or organizations that use them. Does a child with 24 questions in kindergarten show greater innovation as they get older versus one with 12 is a question an economist can ponder. However, the fundamental question at the very heart that economics is constantly trying to answer is efficiency of the use of any resource.

Again, the questions. How do we ensure we waste less food? How do we ensure more people have access to livable capital? Economists are constantly trying to find the perfect recipe to ensure that answers optimal efficiency toward outcomes. As humans have evolved so have our economic systems. In fact, I have often argued that our economic systems should be viewed in a more biological context. They evolve as our needs, wants, and desires evolve. The humans of today have very different NWDs than those of 1,000 years ago or 10,000 years ago and therefore the economic (resource) systems by which we use to meet those NWDs also has evolved. At one point in time we used a barter system, a land system, and now a capital system. Each in an effort to loosely improve the efficiency of obtaining the resources for NWDs of humanity. No system is perfect and no system is pure. Although most of the world currently operates on capitalism, it is different from country to country due to other variables that underpin human behavior like culture, government, and more. There are also intertwines of systems mixed into each other. Taxes by their very nature are an agreed upon socialism. They are an agreed upon use of things the society needs and the burden is bore by the entire society. Things like government, police, and fire are all sourced through taxes and are socialist in nature. Pure economic systems are virtually impossible to achieve all because of one variable – human behavior. Behaviors like sexism, racism, and almost any exclusionary -ism makes the reality for pure capitalism impossible because -isms are an act of socialism. As much as economists like myself study trends and incentives one thing is for sure, human behavior will at some point throw you for a loop like an amusement park roller coaster – with no safety feature.

There are 195 recognized countries in the world, according to the United Nations with approximately 8 billion people, 10,000 distinct religions, endless geographies that influence behavior, and so much more. To say that at any point in time an economic model could be upended is putting it kindly. This makes structuring the efficiency of global resources a crude science at best for economics. Historically, those with the strongest militaries have often dominated whatever economic system was in place. Sometimes it is also the luck of geography. The United States of America, Saudi Arabia, and Russia happened to be countries formed on top of arguably the world’s largest oil holdings. Oil is quite literally a fossil fuel that forms from the remains of dead organisms over millions and millions of years. The sheer luck of this being important to humanity is impossible to model. How do you model luck in the distribution of global resources? Because of dead organisms dying potentially in concentration in these three geographies millions of years ago, today the humans that sit upon their dirt enjoy an advantageous standard of living that others simply do not. How then do we ensure the resources of the Earth that 8 billion people who comprise millions of different factions and fight over either physically or through policy have an equitable access to? The pessimist in me does not believe it is possible because power is the one constant through every social, economic, or political system that drives at the very heart of our behavior. However, economically Star Trek’s science-fiction world (Trekonomics: The Economics of Star Trek) says there is a possibility. And while it is based on a world that exist post-scarcity perhaps a world of post-scarcity is not what we need. The expansion into space may offer us a post-scarcity world where resources are abundant, but the problem is not abundancy as much as it is control. There is abundance of a lot of resources already on Earth that could be viewed through such a lens where at the very least the needs of every human would be met, but control of those resources makes them behave in a scarcity dynamic. Therefore, the only real solution is to remove the human decision making-ish.

Enter, Skynet. Just for a brief reminder of why Skynet brings dystopian fears to anyone familiar with it, “Skynet was originally intended to coordinate unmanned military hardware for the U.S. government and was given power over the military and its weapons.” Skynet, is the antagonist in the Terminator franchise that seeks to destroy humanity after it becomes self-aware. In the franchise, Skynet is described as “an artificial neural network-based conscious group mind and artificial general superintelligence system” or as the Terminator character Kyle Reese describes, “new… powerful… hooked into everything, trusted to run it all.” The essence of its creation was to give the U.S. military the ability to have a system that could run every model, see every possibility, and act accordingly before their enemies. Therein lies the economics rub.

Hello, Skynetomics. A program and system that would be independent of all human decision making, would be responsible for any and every resource needed for an efficient distribution of said resources, and would create a baseline human existence. Gone would be arguments over equitable distribution of water, education, income, and more. Skynetomics would decide who gets what and how much. Everyone and everything would be on a resource allowance that would usher in a new global standard of living floor – not ceiling. Ushered out the luck of being born on the right piece of dirt at the right place and time. That your great-great-great-great grandfather thousands of years ago was the head of the right clan and now you are the heir to the throne of England would potentially be a thing of the past. The ceiling of what one does with that allowance would still be up to them, but generations would no longer be born behind or ahead theoretically. Humans no longer responsible for how to obtain the resources of survival are now setup to test the infinite possibilities of their potential.

The problem of this is like everything else as it relates to economics – the human variable. Creating the system without the input of a proper representation of the world would be simply putting a nuclear weapon into the hand of whoever designed and implemented it. Computer programming suffers infinite biases like everything else in the world does despite what the technocrats would have us believe. Meritocracy and unbiased it is not. We see this with the obtuse percentage of women who are programmers or how scanners often do not recognize darker skin tones. Who would be designing Skynetomics would be as important as the program itself. We are a species built on power and control (like so many other species despite our hubris in thinking otherwise) so the development of a system that removes it may actually be beyond our capacity since rarely do any of us know our biases. Humans after all most primal and infinite resource may actually be the desire to control other humans.