Category Archives: Philanthropy

When the Numbers Don’t Add Up: Shannon Sharpe’s $10 Million Settlement (Offer) and Savannah State University’s $12 Million Endowment

“If we don’t support our own institutions, who will? Our future depends on it.” – Dr. Johnnetta B. Cole

In a society where celebrity controversy often overshadows institutional legacy, the recent $10 million legal settlement offer by Shannon Sharpe is notable not just for its allegations, but for what it inadvertently reveals about the chasm between Black celebrity wealth and the underfunded institutions that shape it.

Sharpe, an NFL Hall of Famer turned sports media luminary, is embroiled in a sexual assault lawsuit in April 2025 that has added fuel to the fodder over his public image for years. The allegations, dating back to 2021, accused him of sexual assault and misconduct. Though the terms of the settlement do not admit guilt, the figure—$10 million—is enough to reverberate well beyond the courtroom. Particularly for Savannah State University, Sharpe’s alma mater, whose entire endowment hovers just north of $12 million.

That a single lawsuit settlement could nearly eclipse the full financial endowment of a university—an institution that has educated generations of Black students since its founding in 1890—demands attention. It is more than legal coincidence; it is cultural commentary. Sharpe’s settlement and Savannah State’s endowment share more than proximity in value—they reflect a profound misalignment between individual Black success and collective Black institutional health.

Celebrity Capitalism vs. Institutional Capital

Sharpe’s alleged settlement offer arrives at a time when he is more visible than ever. From ESPN panels to viral podcast interviews, he has crafted a new media identity grounded in charisma, cultural commentary, and athletic credibility. He is a multimillionaire many times over, and for much of the public, a figure of Black excellence.

And yet, while the scandal has put his reputation into question, the institutional damage is more structural than sensational. Savannah State University, like most HBCUs, remains chronically underfunded. In Georgia, the flagship University of Georgia enjoys an endowment exceeding $1.8 billion. Savannah State’s $12 million looks less like a war chest than a coin jar.

This contrast is not unique. Harvard’s endowment, currently over $50 billion, generates more passive income in a single day than most HBCUs earn annually. Meanwhile, Black cultural, entertainment, and sports figures continue to accumulate individual wealth—largely without corresponding reinvestment in the institutions that launched their journeys.

In Sharpe’s case, it is particularly jarring. He has long spoken with pride about Savannah State, often positioning his ascent from a small HBCU to NFL stardom as proof of grit, talent, and perseverance. But the question remains: can Black America afford to celebrate individual ascent while its institutions struggle to survive?

Institutions as the Forgotten Priority

The logic of endowments is simple: they are long-term capital. Through careful management, they yield investment income that sustains a university’s operations—faculty salaries, scholarships, research grants, infrastructure. A $12 million endowment, assuming a 5% annual drawdown, provides just $600,000 per year. That’s not enough to fund a single major building renovation or hire a cohort of tenure-track faculty.

Yet for a fraction of what he has paid in legal settlements, Sharpe—or any number of successful HBCU alumni—could fundamentally change the trajectory of such institutions. This is not to single out Sharpe, but to highlight the imbalance. In an ideal world, the very wealth that is now being paid out in settlements would be instead building libraries, research labs, and scholarship funds.

This tension is particularly visible among athletes and entertainers. Black America’s most visible ambassadors often emerge from institutions that are themselves invisible in the national philanthropic conversation. According to UNCF, the combined endowments of all HBCUs total less than $5 billion. The Ivies, by contrast, hold over $200 billion in endowment assets.

Culture, Crisis, and the Limits of Individualism

Sharpe’s settlement speaks to more than a personal reckoning—it is a cultural moment. It raises questions about power, accountability, and how society arbitrates guilt and innocence outside the courtroom. But for the Black community, it should also prompt deeper reflection on how fame and fortune are managed—and how institutions are too often left behind.

There is a troubling pattern: institutions that produce Black talent are celebrated in name, while being abandoned in practice. Alumni homecomings become nostalgic affairs, rich in ritual but poor in revenue. HBCUs are used as cultural references in music and fashion, but rarely as investment priorities.

The result is that even as African Americans make gains in representation and cultural power, their institutions remain at risk of irrelevance or collapse. The stakes are not merely educational—they are existential. Without strong institutions, there can be no sustainable community power.

What a $10 Million Gift Would Mean

Imagine instead that $10 million were a donation, not a payout. At Savannah State, that amount would nearly double the endowment overnight. It could launch a center for Black media studies, a school of sports journalism, or fund full scholarships for dozens of students. It could digitize archives, attract talent, and fund study-abroad programs that broaden horizons.

Better yet, it could serve as a challenge grant—a call for other high-profile HBCU alumni to match it, dollar for dollar. Such a campaign could transform the entire financial landscape of HBCUs in a single generation.

There is precedent. Oprah Winfrey’s $13 million donation to Morehouse College, Robert F. Smith’s debt forgiveness gesture at Morehouse’s graduation, and Reed Hastings’ $120 million donation to Spelman, Morehouse, and UNCF during the racial reckoning of 2020 showed what’s possible. But sporadic generosity is not a strategy. What’s needed is a systemic culture of giving—an institutional ethos that reorients Black wealth toward Black infrastructure.

Moving from Scandal to Structure

Sharpe, like many public figures, is navigating a complex personal and professional moment. Settling a case of this magnitude inevitably invites scrutiny. But what comes next is more important. Can this moment be a catalyst—not just for personal reflection, but for public responsibility?

Celebrity scandals are ephemeral. Institutions, if cared for, are permanent. The opportunity now is for Sharpe—and others in similar positions—to pivot toward legacy-building. That means using their platforms not only to defend their names, but to elevate their alma maters. To protect not just brand equity, but intellectual capital. To trade spectacle for structure.

A Future Worth Investing In

Savannah State University is not just a school—it is a symbol of survival, intellect, and potential. Its alumni include judges, scientists, teachers, engineers, and businesspeople. It deserves more than to be a footnote in a celebrity controversy. It deserves capital, vision, and strategic philanthropy.

In the end, the numbers don’t lie. A $10 million lawsuit may capture headlines. But a $12 million endowment defines futures. The question is not what Shannon Sharpe did or didn’t do—but what he and others like him will do next.

If fame is fleeting and fortune unpredictable, then perhaps the wisest investment is the one that cannot be taken away: the institutions that built you.

Could You Spend $30 Million In 30 Days on Us? How Monty Brewster Could Have Spent $30 Million with African American Businesses

“And we’re in the business of being in business, and we’re doin’ business.” – “Monty” Brewster

The 1985 film Brewster’s Millions, starring Richard Pryor as Montgomery “Monty” Brewster, tells the story of a man who must spend $30 million in 30 days without accumulating assets or informing anyone of his goal in order to inherit $300 million. Adjusted for inflation, Brewster’s $30 million would be approximately $85 million in today’s dollars, while the $300 million inheritance would be worth over $850 million. While Monty’s spending spree involved extravagant parties, failed investments, and creative tactics to burn through cash, the film missed an opportunity to showcase meaningful economic empowerment strategies. By directing his wealth toward African American businesses, Monty could have positively impacted communities while still meeting the conditions of the challenge. This article outlines how Brewster could have spent his fortune effectively within the African American business ecosystem.

  1. Investing in Education, Arts, and Wellness for African American Communities ($1.5 million or $4.25 million in today’s dollars)

Monty Brewster could have channeled a portion of his funds toward HBCUs, African American arts organizations, and health initiatives. These institutions play a vital role in developing African American leadership, entrepreneurship, and cultural advancement. Brewster could have funded scholarships, financed infrastructure improvements, or supported specialized academic programs such as business incubation centers. Additionally, Brewster could have become a major patron of African American artists, musicians, and cultural organizations. Funding live performances, commissioning murals and sculptures, or sponsoring large-scale cultural events would have allowed him to inject cash into the creative sector while meeting the requirement to spend without accumulating lasting assets.

Health disparities have historically affected African American communities. Brewster could have supported Black-owned health clinics, funded wellness programs, or launched temporary mental health outreach initiatives. Sponsoring community health fairs and free medical check-up events could have aligned with his spending goals. To adhere to his challenge’s constraints, Brewster is limited charitable giving to $1.5 million. Within that budget, he could have made substantial contributions to civil rights organizations such as the National Center for Black Family Life, Black Teacher Collaborative, and African American Credit Union Coalition. Funding advocacy campaigns, legal defense funds, and educational outreach programs would have ensured his spending aligned with causes that strengthen social equity. By underwriting public awareness campaigns or supporting temporary voter registration drives, he could have spent large sums while advancing civil rights initiatives.

  1. Supporting African American Media Companies ($4 million or $11.3 million in today’s dollars)

The media landscape has historically marginalized African American voices. Brewster could have spend money in Black-owned newspapers, radio stations, and production companies. By purchasing advertising space, sponsoring TV segments, or funding film productions that amplify African American stories, he could have spent millions while strengthening the narrative control of the community. This would have been especially true when he ran for mayor of New York City with his “None Of The Above” campaign which allows him to burn through millions.

  1. Empowering African American-Owned Interior Designers ($3 million or $8.5 million in today’s dollars)

Instead of investing in real estate projects with limited long-term impact, Brewster could have hired African American-owned interior design firms to revamp commercial spaces, restaurants, and event venues. Funding redesigns for offices, galleries, or retail spaces would have allowed him to spend significant amounts quickly while showcasing Black creative talent. Partnering with these designers to create temporary installations, pop-up exhibits, or themed public events would further align with Brewster’s spending objectives.

  1. Supporting Black-Owned Restaurants and Hospitality ($5 million or $14.2 million in today’s dollars)

Instead of squandering money on excessive parties with little social value, Brewster could have organized lavish gatherings catered exclusively by Black-owned restaurants, breweries, and event-planning companies. Hosting galas, networking events, or concerts powered by African American businesses would have rapidly spent millions while empowering these enterprises. Additionally, Brewster could have pre-paid months of reservations at Black-owned hotels for conferences, weddings, and events that celebrate Black culture.

  1. Promoting and Empowering African American Entrepreneurs in Technology ($4 million or $11.3 million in today’s dollars)

During the 1980s, technology was emerging as a transformative industry. Brewster could have directed funds to African American inventors, tech startups, and computer training programs. Sponsoring computer literacy drives in underserved neighborhoods, purchasing computers for community centers, or funding coding boot camps would have injected significant capital into this sector without violating the “no assets” condition. Additionally, Brewster could have launched a series of pitch competitions or startup grant programs to fund Black entrepreneurs. By awarding no-strings-attached grants to aspiring business owners, Brewster could have circulated his funds directly into the hands of innovative minds in the community. Creating a “Brewster’s Millionaire Fund” for new ventures would have established a lasting narrative of empowerment.

  1. Financing Black-Owned Transportation Companies ($4 million or $11.3 million in today’s dollars)

Brewster’s challenge required rapid cash outflows. He could have achieved this by chartering fleets of Black-owned transportation services, including buses, limousines, and taxis. Organizing free ride programs, senior citizen transport services, or back-to-school bus initiatives would have ensured meaningful community impact while fulfilling the spending requirements.

  1. Sponsoring Sports Teams in the African American Community ($4.5 million or $12.7 million in today’s dollars)

In the film, Brewster splurged on funding a struggling baseball team. He could have expanded this vision by sponsoring youth sports leagues, purchasing uniforms from Black-owned apparel companies, and financing travel expenses for underserved teams. By supporting athletics in underserved communities, he would have combined financial impact with social good.

  1. Creating Pop-Up Markets and Retail Experiences ($4 million or $11.3 million in today’s dollars)

To rapidly circulate cash, Brewster could have sponsored temporary markets that featured Black-owned businesses. By covering booth fees, marketing costs, and other overhead expenses, he could have injected cash into dozens of retail entrepreneurs. Such events would celebrate local artisans, designers, and vendors while creating a meaningful economic impact.

Monty Brewster’s dilemma of spending $30 million in 30 days presented a unique opportunity to create lasting change. By investing heavily in African American businesses, nonprofits, and community initiatives, Brewster could have met his goal while strengthening economic power in marginalized communities. Such a storyline would not only have showcased Brewster’s ingenuity but also highlighted the immense potential of targeted investment to uplift communities. If Hollywood ever revisits Brewster’s Millions, perhaps they will reimagine his spending spree as a transformative journey of economic empowerment.

2023’s HBCU Million Dollar Gifts: No African American Million Dollar Gifts To HBCUs

“Philanthropy is an exercise in power, by definition by the wealthy.” – Rob Reich

After an abysmal 2022, the HBCU Million Dollar Gifts list in 2023 bounced back? Well, sort of. In 2022 there were only three donations and now in 2023 there are five. Mathematically one would argue for that being a 66 percent increase, but then one realizes there were twice as many $100 million donations given or pledged to PWIs as there were $1 million donations given or pledged to HBCUs it throws water colder than the artic onto the conversation. Furthermore, one of those donations was pledged in 2023 by one Sean Combs who is now arguably in so much legal trouble that the pledge will likely never turn into a gift for its recipient, Jackson State University. To make the donation by Mr. Combs even more frustrating, it was the only one among the list by an African American further reinforcing that African American donors who can give million dollar donations are still not interested in supporting HBCUs with any fever.

The donations that did arrive went to the usual suspects of Howard (2), Spelman, and Tuskegee. Unless Spelman has a massive donation up its sleeve (and it is certainly possible), then Howard is going to coast to becoming the first HBCU to have a $1 billion endowment. To put in perspective how large the acute the donor crisis is between PWI and HBCU donors requires just taking a look at the largest 2023 donation by a donor. James Simons and Marilyn Simons gave a gift of $500 million to SUNY Stony Brook. A donation equal to over 50 percent of the Howard University’s endowment and over 90 percent of Spelman College’s endowment. Meanwhile, African America’s wealthy are virtually silent year after year.

There continues to be a massive disconnect of African America pouring resources into its own institutions. This is as true of the lack of African American donors to HBCUs as the embarrassment that virtually no HBCUs bank with an African American owned bank or even two premier HBCUs in Hampton University and North Carolina A&T University leaving an HBCU conference for a PWI one. The island mentality of everyone and every institution looking out for themselves while claiming they are for the community has reached a nauseating level year after year and should make anyone wonder if there is any reason to have hope. None of this fairs well for smaller HBCUs with the looming enrollment cliff crisis facing all American colleges and universities and for which HBCUs will certainly bear the brunt as with almost every crisis that America has.

Overall donations to all colleges and universities were down a second straight year in 2023 dropping from 275 to 259 Million Dollar Gifts.

$1 Million Plus Donations To All Colleges: 259

$100 Million Plus Donations To All Colleges: 10

$1 Million Plus Donations Value To All Colleges: $6.1 Billion

$1 Million Plus Median Donation To All Colleges: $10.0 Million

$1 Million Plus Average Donation To All Colleges: $23.6 Million

$1 Million Plus Donations To HBCUs: 5

$100 Million Plus Donations To HBCUs: 0

$1 Million Plus Donations Value To HBCUs: $45.6 Million

$1 Million Plus Median Donation To HBCUs: $10.0 Million

$1 Million Plus Average Donation To HBCUs: $9.3 Million

HBCU Percentage of Donations To All Colleges: 1.9%

HBCU Percentage of Donation Value To All Colleges: 0.8%

1. Carrie Walton Penner and Gregory Penner (pictured) – $20.0 million
Recipient: Howard University
Source of Wealth: Professional Sports, Family Wealth, Finance

2. MacKenzie Scott (pictured) – $12.0 million
Recipient: Howard University
Source of Wealth: Technology, Retail

3. John Brown and Rosemary Brown (pictured) – $10.0 million
Recipient: Spelman College
Source of Wealth: Health Products

4.Stephen Feinberg – $3.6 million
Recipient: Tuskegee University
Source of Wealth: Finance

5.Sean Combs – $1.0 million (Pledge)
Recipient: Jackson State University
Source of Wealth: Entertainment

Source: Chronicle of Philanthropy

Starting a Philanthropy Club: A Collective Approach to African American Giving

“I have found that among its other benefits, giving liberates the soul of the giver.” – Dr. Maya Angelou. 

If you’ve been considering joining or starting an philanthropy club with your family, friends, or fellow HBCU alumni but are unsure if it’s the right move, you’ve come to the right place. The answer is it is absolutely the right move.

A few facts regarding African American organizations and nonprofits:

Philanthropy clubs can be a powerful tool for leveraging African American philanthropy from like-minded individuals. They not only enhance your financial literacy and knowledge about African American and African Diaspora organizations but also empower you to make informed philanthropic decisions. By pooling your resources with your family, you can collectively grow your impact African American nonprofits finances and outreach, fostering a sense of confidence and control over institutional development and empowerment.

Keep reading as we discuss why you might want to start an investment club and the steps you’ll need to take.

Why You’ll Want to Start a Philanthropy Club?

One of the biggest reasons to start an philanthropy club is that they want to learn and share ideas with people who share their values. It makes sense to start a philanthropy club with family, friends, or HBCU alumni because, most of the time, your values are well-aligned. Yes, you may have different opinions, but your values are generally on the same page.

Philanthropy clubs can be a great way to learn about African American causes, organizations, and nonprofits. Because some members may be more seasoned donors, givers, or active in the nonprofit space, they can share their knowledge on certain topics.

Philanthropy clubs are a great way to magnify small donations by each member into a large donation by a focused collective. the increase the impact associated with investing. However, with the rise in so many commission-free brokers, the fees for making a high volume of trades aren’t as big of a deal.

How to Start an Investment Club

If you’re ready to get your philanthropy club with family, friends, or HBCU alumni off the ground, you’ll want to follow these steps to ensure success:

1. Find and Organize Members

Finding members for a philanthropy club is generally one of the most challenging steps. However, it’s a little easier if you’re looking to start one with your family, friends, or HBCU alumni. Either way, ensuring the fit is correct before jumping in is crucial.

A solid philanthropy club should have at least 5 people but no more than 15 or 20. You must have enough ideas, but too many can make things more difficult. Each person will be required to identify a cause, organization, or nonprofit. Then, each month, a different member will present their cause, organization, or nonprofit to the group.

Before extending an invitation to different anyone, ask yourself a few questions. These will help you see if it will be a good fit.

  • Do you trust the person you’re thinking of inviting to be consistent and involved?
  • Will they bring research and ideas to the meetings?
  • Are they organized?
  • Are they going to pay the monthly donation on time?

2. Determine Your Goals

Once you have your members set, you must agree on your goals. Most clubs’ goals will be making donations and learning from others. But how are you going to get to that point?

It’s important to take some time to understand each member’s philanthropic approach. Are they willing to take on more risk or prefer to be more conservative? Do you want to stick with only well known organizations, or are members interested in startup organizations as well? Do they only want to give to domestic organizations? Or are they willing to give to African Diaspora nonprofits working in Haiti, Jamaica, UK, or Africa?

Developing a plan of attack and ensuring that each member is on the same page will be vital to success.

3. Decide How You Want To Give

Deciding on if you want to setup a legal structure for your philanthropy club is important because potentially over time, your club can setup an endowment that invest donors money and that can grow into a significant and sustainable amount of money. Having the necessary legal protections is going to be important. If your philanthropy club decides to actually invest its donations into investments that will grow over time so that the club has larger and more sustainable sums to give is important to think about.

The other option is to simply give everyone the option to donate on their own once the cause, organization, or nonprofit is decided upon. This route relies on the honor system or some type of peer accountability towards giving.

Each philanthropy club must do what works best for them and also realize that the club is allowed to evolve over time.

The Bottom Line

Philanthropy clubs are a great way to pool your donor funds and learn from other members. Just be sure that you join a group where everyone is willing to listen to ideas and pull their own weight within the club.

Island Mentality: Alabama State University’s $125 Million Decision Highlights HBCUs’ Continued Failure To Connect With The African American Financial Sector

Negro banks, as a rule, have failed because the people, taught that their own pioneers in business cannot function in this sphere, withdrew their deposits. – Dr. Carter G. Woodson

What is an ecosystem? How do you develop an ecosystem? Can we develop an African American ecosystem? It seems to be a question that a room full of African American institutional leadership have little understanding of based on the institutional decisions that are continuously made. In their academic paper entitled Economic Ecosystems, Philip E. Auerswald and Lokesh M. Dani, “An ecosystem is defined as a dynamically stable network of interconnected firms and institutions within bounded geographical space. It is proposed that representing regional economic networks as ‘ecosystems’ provides analytical structure and depth to theories of the sources of regional advantage, the role of entrepreneurs in regional development, and the determinants of resilience in regional economic systems.” The most vital part of that definition being interconnected firms and institutions. African American institutions in general at every turn fail to understand this concept and HBCUs are no exception. This is especially true of HBCUs choice of banks and now Alabama State University’s recent decision to forego a plethora of African American Owned Investment and Asset Management firms and hand $125 million to another European American owned investment firm. African American capital once again reinforcing European America’s financial ecosystem – not ours.

It is almost a redundant story at this point. African American institutions all operating on their own island and failing to interconnect and intertwine with each other. African America from individual to institutions all do what is best for themselves individually and not what is best for the collective and certainly not what connects and strengthens the collective. See Hampton University and North Carolina A&T State University decisions to leave an HBCU conference for a PWI one. To that vein is why over 90 percent of African America’s $100 billion in annual tuition revenue goes into PWIs and not HBCUs/PBIs. HBCUs provide very little means of an example for the community to follow. Instead, HBCUs are a glaring headlight of just how poorly African American institutions perform in strategically integrating themselves within the African American ecosystem, especially economically. There are no reports on HBCUs engagement with the African American private sector because HBCUs do not seemingly see that as important. How many of HBCU graduates work for African American owned companies? How much HBCU athletic sponsorship dollars come from African American owned companies/partnerships? How much of the HBCU endowment is invested in African American firms? These are basic questions that any leadership of an HBCU should be able to answer. Unfortunately as Jarrett Carter, Sr., founder of HBCU Digest, once eloquently put it, “Many HBCUs are just trying to be PWI-adjacent.”

Is $125 million a lot of money? Context matters. To any individual, most would agree $125 million is significant. To institutions, it varies on size, scope, and goals. For African American Financial Institutions, almost down to even the largest of our firms having an $125 million account would see their bottom line acutely move. Providing perspective on the landscape, Pension and Investments reports, “The global asset management industry showed some signs of recovery in 2023, with total assets under management (AUM) rising 12% year-over-year to nearly $120 trillion, according to research by Boston Consulting Group.” For African American Asset Managers, “The largest Black-owned asset managers are responsible for more than $253 billion in assets, according to FIN Searches data. Vista Equity Partners is the largest Black-owned firm in the industry, with the private equity manager handling $103.8 billion in assets.” African American Owned Asset Managers only account for 0.2 percent of the global AUM. By contrast, the Top 10 non-Black asset managers have $22 trillion assets under management which accounts for almost 20 percent of global AUM.

The asset management firm that Alabama State University chose according to World Benchmarking Alliance, “Neuberger Berman is a private employee-owned investment management firm (leadership pictured above) headquartered in New York, USA. It was founded in 1939 and has offices in 39 cities across 26 countries. The firm manages equities, fixed income, private equity and hedge fund portfolios for global institutional investors, advisors and high-net-worth individuals. It managed USD 460 billion of assets (under management) in 2021 and employed 2,647 staff in 2022.” This means that Alabama State University’s $125 million is equal to 0.02 percent of assets under management for Neuberger Berman. A drop in the bucket. The entirety of assets at African American Owned Asset Management firms is only 55 percent of Neuberger Berman assets under management. Alabama State University’s $125 million would have lifted the ENTIRE African American Owned Asset Management’s AUM by 0.05 percent. A move that would have strengthened the African American economic and financial ecosystem.

African America as a community talks about the circulation of the dollar or our lack thereof constantly, but what is virtually never talked about is the circulation of the African American institutional dollar being the largest part of that conversation. It is a fairly accepted statistic that the African American dollar does not stay in the African American community for a day, while other communities see their dollar stay in their communities for weeks and in the case of the Asian American community for almost a month. We often think of the circulation of our dollar like everything else, on an island or as an individual. An individual going and buying food from even an expensive African American owned restaurant is $100-200, but an HBCU building a new building means the opportunity for a new loan worth tens of millions for an African American owned bank, it means tens of millions for an African American owned construction company, so on and so forth. Instead, Bethune-Cookman University borrows from a notorious predatory lender to the African American community in Wells Fargo and almost finds itself losing those buildings due to foreclosure.

HBCU alumni know little about the state of finances or the movement of the money at their alma maters. HBCU administrators either willfully withholding the information or inept themselves of the importance of the information and providing it. Both are problematic. The notion that HBCUs cannot find African American investment firms is a painful thought knowing that a Google search would bring up the HBCU Money African American Owned Bank Directory at the very least. The likelihood is more in line with what Mr. Carter said in that a good deal of HBCU leadership simply wants to be like their PWI counterparts is far more likely. This would explain the debacle “donation” accepted by Florida A&M University’s president recently where a simple Google search would have avoided such embarrassment. Instead, Alabama State University’s Neuberger Berman relationship and a plethora of others instances (a decade ago when we reported “Spelman College & Regions Bank – A Failure To Disclose”) is that likely they are simply mimicking PWI actions and unwittingly reinforcing the PWI/European American ecosystem to say the least. Unfortunately, that mimicking reinforces another community’s economic and financial ecosystems not ours and why you may never see OneUnited Field at any HBCU’s athletic facility. Because we are holding out for J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, or Wells Fargo to show us the same love they show PWIs. Not acknowledging those are not our community’s banks.

If HBCUs are simply going to behave as PWI-adjacent institutions, then it is hard to argue with why over 90 percent of African Americans who go to college are not choosing HBCUs. For many it becomes a question of why get a knockoff when they can get the real thing. After all their ice is colder. HBCUs, HBCU alumni associations, and HBCU support organizations as a whole are not making decisions related to African American institutions ecosystem’s interests and interconnectivity and that is most glaring in the poor institutional decisions we are making in regards to our institutional finances and endowments.