Category Archives: Philanthropy

The 20 Year Review: 1994 & 2014 HBCU Endowments Then & Now

weekly-review

The 2014 HBCU Top 10 Endowments list is out. Going forward we will review where HBCUs are today and where they were 20 years ago. NACUBO’s list this year included 851 reporting institutions from the U.S. and Canada. So here are a few fast facts of then and now in regards to HBCUs place in the whole of the endowment conversation.

  • Of the 851 reporting institutions in 2014, only 1.7 percent were HBCUs. HBCUs comprise 3 percent of American colleges and universities. In 1993, Of the 446 reporting institutions in 1994, only 0.9 percent were HBCUs.
  • 20 years ago, the 4 HBCUs who were present on the list had a combined endowment value of $356 993 000 versus the top 4 HWCUs who had a combined endowment value of $17 726 252 000.
  • The endowment wealth gap between the top HWCUs/HBCUs in 2014 was 106:1. In 1994, it was 50:1.
  • In 1994, 17 HWCUs reported endowments over $1 billion and 2 HBCUs reported endowments over $100 million. In 2014, there were 92 HWCUs with reported endowments over $1 billion or an increase of 441 percent. HBCUs increased their ranks of $100 million endowments from 2 to 5 or an increase of 150 percent – unchanged from the 1993 to 2013 review.

The suspected widening in the HWCU/HBCU endowment gap was no surprise in this year’s endowment numbers. A combined factor of under market returns and major capital campaigns raising billions at HWCUs is only bolstering their endowment strongholds. While there is a great focus on the household wealth gap between African American households and other groups, very little attention remains paid to the institutional wealth gap that is often more reflective of a group’s health than any other. Meanwhile, just how many hundreds of millions or perhaps billions the Parent Plus Loan debacle by the US Department of Education ultimately will cost HBCU endowments long-term is immeasurable. This is especially true when 11 percent of HWCUs reporting in 2014 have over $1 billion plus in endowments. On the flip side, only 7 percent of HBCUs are over $100 million. The gap can be closed, but how? That has to be on the mind of every HBCU president, development office, and most importantly the alumni.

559 Donations To Colleges Over $1 Million in 2013 – Only 1 To An HBCU

Screen Shot 2014-08-06 at 2.25.58 PM

Pictured above: Jesse F. Brown, the sole HBCU donor to give a donation of $1M or above in 2013. Courtesy of Morgan Magazine.

By William A. Foster, IV

The highest use of capital is not to make more money, but to make money do more for the betterment of life.— Henry Ford 

Wealth is an arms race. The more you have the more you can control others. The less you have the more dependent you are on others. This adage is as true as anywhere in higher education institutions who can end up being beholden socially, economically, and political to major donors and their agendas if they do not have endowments that allow for autonomy. How much is enough? Well, if you use Godfather (the movie) logic, there is never enough and the moment you slow down others are catching up. Otherwise, how do you explain Harvard’s $6.5 billion capital campaign it launched last year. This from a university that already has the world’s – yes the world’s – largest higher education institutional endowment of over $30 billion. An amount fifteen times the size of all 100 HBCU endowments combined. More importantly, what does it say about HBCU development offices that they can not land high-quality and transformative donors? Instead, some HBCU development offices lean on students and faculty to pick up the slack. The very people who are suppose to benefit from strong development work.

HBCU capital campaigns are quite frankly bland, boring, and leave little in the way for young or old alumni to feel compelled to give assuming they are even asked. More times than not a mimic of their HWCU counterparts and not culturally designed to an African American philanthropy point of view. Most students and alumni of HBCUs I talk to rarely know what an endowment is let alone what their school’s is – assuming it has one. Six years ago pre-recession while doing some research on HBCU endowments there were 20 percent of HBCUs who I could not verify or account for having an endowment, period. Wait, Harvard is trying to raise $6.5 billion and we have schools with no endowment?  Maybe HBCU development offices need to take a page from John F. Kennedy’s speech where he gallantly said, “before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth.” That is how HBCU development offices need to think. I would love for an HBCU to come out and say “WE WILL BE THE FIRST BILLION DOLLAR HBCU ENDOWMENT” and communicate to alumni their role of how and why it will happen. How bold would that be? People would start finding pennies in their seat cushion to give because HBCU alumni are competitive if they are nothing else. Something to consider is also HBCU conferences taking a more active role in development. HBCUs could consolidate their development resources under one banner and possibly could leverage more marketing and outreach to high-quality and transformative donors.

In light of the recent donation to Paul Quinn, an HBCU located in Dallas, donations of $1 million plus to HBCUs are as rare as lightning striking someone. When HBCUs do get donations that are $1 million plus they tend to be from an alum’s estate meaning the person might have waited an entire lifetime to make one grand donation. An indication of just how long it is taking for HBCU graduates to accumulate wealth, which can be attributed to a number of different issues, but at the forefront tend to be weak financial literacy and lack of entrepreneurship or asset ownership. Demographics are also constantly pushing against HBCUs. Despite a recent study by Boston Consulting Group that reports there are now 7.1 million American households that are millionaires  and almost 4 800 households worth more than $100 million, the development of wealth has not taken root in African America. Only 1 of the 400 richest Americans are African American or the equivalent of 0.25 percent. It is hard not to suspect the aforementioned numbers are vastly better. 

The Chronicle of Philanthropy tracks a database of annual giving to different causes that exceed $1 million. In 2013, 559 donations  went to colleges and universities with only 1 going to an HBCU or an equivalent of 0.18 percent. This despite HBCUs constituting 3 percent of all American colleges and universities. Fourteen of the donations exceeded $100 million or more with Phil Knight, owner of Nike, and his wife giving $500 million to the University of Oregon’s hospital topping the list. Not much of a problem for a man who has $5.4 billion of his wealth in cash alone. Yes, Phil Knight has almost twice as much in cash as Oprah Winfrey has in total wealth. The lone HBCU donation exceeding $1 million was to Morgan State University from alum Jesse F. Brown who bequested $1.2 million for their medical technology program.

So why are more HBCUs not receiving transformative and high-quality donations? There are after all a number of millionaires scattered throughout the African Diaspora. My belief is that as many HBCUs have moved away from being considered African American colleges to just wanting to be recognized as  American colleges creating a psychological disconnect that would prompt those of African descent here in America and elsewhere to have any reason to support them. Carl and Ruth Shapiro never attended Brandeis University, but have been noted on record for their giving to the school because they want it to be a good representation of the Jewish community and therefore gets their support. HBCU development offices have refused seemingly to blow that same horn to African American and Diaspora non-alumni potential donors. There is also the mixed relationship between actually asking and being image conscious about who is giving. Wilberforce and Central State University in Ohio should be at LeBron James front door trying to build a relationship with him. Morris Brown and the AUC schools should be at T.I.’s front door trying to build a relationship with him. I could go on and on, but the reality is USC was not afraid to develop a relationship with Dr. Dre because of his image in gangster rap. HBCUs also have to look abroad for donors, which is part of why recruiting donations as a conference may be more cost effective. Aliko Dangote, Mike Adenuga, Isabel dos Santos, and Patrice Motsepe have a combined net worth of $31.5 billion. They may be down for the cause, but if you do not want to be a part of the cause, then why should they choose you over schools more widely recognized globally. Connecting the African American and African Diaspora experience could go a long way into an exchange that helps all parties.

What does it say to African America that the only money we can raise is from everyone, but our own community? The most recent major donations to HBCUs have come from the Koch brothers to UNCF and from Trammel Crow to Paul Quinn. As usual, it will not be until others tell us that our institutions are worthy that we will think so ourselves. I dare say we still continue to be the only group who has to be convinced that having institutions that represent our social, economic, and political interest are important, but vital to community success. This is where courting the likes of the aforementioned young African American millionaires and African billionaires can have an impact. They can not only bring major donations, but the press they bring can create a domino effect from other African Americans and Diasporans to consider giving to our institutions. What do you have to lose? After all, when you shoot for the moon, even if you miss you will land amongst the stars.

HBCU Money’s 12 Month HBCU Alumni Giving Challenge

Endowment_Plant

To give away money is an easy matter, and in any man’s power. But to decide to whom to give it, and how large and when, and for what purpose and how, is neither in every man’s power-nor an easy matter. Hence it is that such excellence is rare, praiseworthy and noble. – Aristotle

The HBCU Money™ 12 Month Challenge is an effort to help HBCUs and HBCU support organization increase their charitable donations. We are offering this challenge sheet to HBCU alumni, alumni associations, and friends of HBCUs. You can challenge yourself, a fellow alum, or anyone who is interested in giving to the HBCU Diaspora. Share your progress on social media to inspire others. Keep a hard copy on your refrigerator. Whatever it takes to keep ourselves accountable to empowering our institutions for tomorrow.

HBCU or HBCU Organization:

Your Name:

Your Challenger:

Giving Purpose:

  • Month 1 – $1

  • Month 2 – $2

  • Month 3 – $4

  • Month 4 – $8

  • Month 5 – $16

  • Month 6 – $32

  • Month 7 – $64

  • Month 8 – $128

  • Month 9 – $256

  • Month 10 – $512

  • Month 11 – $1024

  • Month 12 – $2048

The Race To The First Billion Dollar HBCU Endowment: Can Anyone Catch Howard?

By William A. Foster, IV

Whenever I may be tempted to slack up and let the business run for awhile on its own impetus, I picture my competitor sitting at a desk in his opposition house, thinking and thinking with the most devilish intensity and clearness, and I ask myself what I can do to be prepared for his next brilliant move. – H. Gordon Selfridge

brathwaite-photo-finish

 

There will be a lot of excitement whenever an HBCU finally reaches the magical one billion dollar endowment plateau. It will be unfounded excitement, but there will be excitement. By now, multiple HBCUs should have achieved billion dollar status, but a mixture of desegregation, poor financial literacy even among our educated alum, and arguably poor communication historically between the institutions themselves and alumni about the endowment and its value have stymied the growth of HBCU endowments. Many have the attitude that their attendance and tuition is all the “giving” they need to give to their HBCU. Some argue bad experiences while during matriculation also has made alumni adverse to giving, but that logic can be a bit dunce and short-sighted. This is because many of the poor experiences that the alum experienced were often a result of poor resources available to train staff better and antiquated software. Alas, this is not to remove the institutions’ responsibility. They certainly deserve their share for not making customer service the number one, two, and three priority. Too many HBCUs still are stuck in mimic mode of their HWCU counterparts in strategic behavior. This includes institutional outreach and advancement where often HBCUs did not and do not pay attention to the cultural differences in giving patterns between African Americans and other groups.

HBCUs in general lack a pool of high-quality and transformative donors. We define the former as “high-quality donors who give consistently and over their lifetime will probably give six to seven figures of donations” and the latter as “donations from transformative donors range from eight to nine figures.” The top ten donations to colleges last year were a combined $2.5 billion with Phil and Penelope Knight, the owners of Nike, putting $500 million in the lap of University of Oregon. HBCUs have missed accessing high-quality donors in the world of hip-hop and entertainment in my opinion at times because they have not wanted the association that comes with many of these artist and their image. Meanwhile, schools like Rice and Harvard University have welcomed the likes of Bun B of UGK and Nas into their wombs, respectively. The latter actually having a fellowship named after him at Harvard. This has cost HBCUs in terms of both finances and publicity. Publicity that is strongly needed to make up for the imbalance in being able to recruit today’s students also known as future donors.

So who is in the running to reach the billion dollar mark? Howard University comes in with the largest endowment at $513 million, which puts it a full $186 million ahead of number two rival Spelman who has a $327 million endowment. In third place, Hampton University with an endowment of $254 million and trailing Howard’s endowment by $259 million. Other notables who are long shots in the race are Meharry Medical College, Florida A&M University, and Tuskegee University with endowments of $124 million, $115 million, and $105 million, respectively. Before anyone ask where is Morehouse and its $130 million endowment, current president John Wilson himself pointed out that in terms of endowment-expense ratio, Spelman is 4:1 and Morehouse is at 1.3:1. Needless to say, while Morehouse needs to desperately build its endowment it appears to have bigger concerns that could leave it too unfocused to be a legit player. These are all of the HBCUs who have at least $100 million endowments. After them the drop off is so acute that it would take a transformative donation for any kind of consideration.

The big 3 of Howard, Spelman, and Hampton all have unique advantages and problems. Howard’s biggest advantage other than being halfway there is the Howard University Endowment Act sponsored by Dan Quayle in 1984. The act currently grants Howard $3.6 million currently in a matching endowment grant. According to Govtrack, “Requires the University, in order to receive such a grant, to deposit in the endowment an amount equal to such grant.” In other words, Howard University is working with a 1:1 match. What is not clear in the bill is if it is limited to specific type of donations from donors. If it does not have limitations, then that is one heck of a weapon. The school is also the only HBCU that is a full-service HBCU meaning it has both a medical school and law school. Something that allows it to produce higher earning alum than its counterparts. Unfortunately, with the good comes some bad. Howard has recently been in the news recently with downgrades by credit agencies for its debt, cutting about 200 staff positions, and public fighting between trustees in the media. Spelman, ranked number two, definitely benefited from what is today valued at a $40 million gift from Bill and Camille Cosby in 1988. An amount equivalent to 12 percent of today’s endowment. You can look at that as glass half full or empty. Full in that they have secured a transformative donation and could again or empty that to this day it still comprises a disproportionate amount of their endowment. On the negative, Spelman has struggled the past few years with their ROI returns for their endowment. The ROI ranking was been the lowest among all top ten HBCU Money endowments in 2013. There seems to be some serious questions about conflicts of interest with Spelman’s board of trustee, Theodore Aronson, who is also the head of their investment committee, his company AJO, and some of Spelman’s investments which have not faired near as well as other HBCUs over the past few years. That could allow Hampton to push pass who trails Spelman by $73 million. Another headwind facing Spelman is the lack of a graduate school which aforementioned in regards to Howard produces higher earning alumni on average. Lastly, Hampton would need to double its endowment or achieve a 100 percent ROI on its current endowment to catch up to Howard – lightning would strike Emancipation Oak twice before the latter would happen. Warren Buffett, considered the greatest investor of all-time, has historically managed around 20 percent annually for the past 45 years. However, given Hampton’s leadership in the form of president William Harvey, who has always kept Hampton fiscally aggressive by limiting the amount it takes from the endowment to 3 percent allowing for greater reinvestment than their peers. It would seem that financial talent and strategy is on Hampton’s side. Hampton is potentially too reliant on its investment strategy and not as much on its alumni development as the school’s giving rate is among the lowest among the big three. Their biggest donation still is from George Eastman, founder of Eastman Kodak, whose $1 million donation in 1924 is valued at approximately $13.8 million adjusted for inflation.

A major factor in all of this and at the heart of it is alumni. An examination of alumni giving rates since 2008 have seen Howard range in the 13-17 percent, Spelman in the 39-41 percent range, and Hampton with 10-16 percent. Percentages can be somewhat misleading giving alumni populations. Howard has by far the largest alumni base of the three schools followed by Hampton and then Spelman. Although the size of the alumni base can be offset by higher giving per alumni, so not too much should be read into these numbers, but it is better to know them than not if you are a development office.

So who do we think we get there first? It is honestly still too early to tell. Given the recent unsettled nature of HBCUs from the private elites to the state institutions to the small liberal arts HBCUs, it seems HBCUs are in a constant proverbial minefield. These three are the head and shoulders favorites, but a transformative donation among any number of HBCUs could change the landscape in a hurry. This could be as they say in the racing world a photo finish.

 

The 20 Year Review: 1993 & 2013 HBCU Endowments Then & Now

By William A. Foster, IV

dangling

The 2013 HBCU Top 10 Endowments list is out. Going forward we will review where HBCUs are today and where they were 20 years ago. NACUBO’s list this year included 849 reporting institutions from the U.S. and Canada. So here are a few fast facts of then and now in regards to HBCUs place in the whole of the endowment conversation.

  • Of the 849 reporting institutions in 2013, only 1.5 percent were HBCUs. HBCUs comprise 3 percent of American colleges and universities. In 1993, Of the 437 reporting institutions in 1993, only 0.9 percent were HBCUs.
  • 20 years ago, the 4 HBCUs who were present on the list had a combined endowment value of $329 135 000 versus the top 4 HWCUs who had a combined endowment value of $15 137 350 000.
  • The endowment wealth gap between the top HWCUs/HBCUs in 2013 was 103:1. In 1993, it was 46:1.
  • In 1993, 16 HWCUs reported endowments over $1 billion and 2 HBCUs reported endowments over $100 million. There were 83 HWCUs in 2013 with reported endowments over $1 billion or an increase of 518 percent. HBCUs increased their ranks of $100 million endowments from 2 to 5 or an increase of 150 percent.

The numbers are disturbing. There are a number of contributing factors to the institutional wealth gap increase. Because institutional wealth factor tends to directly correlate with individual wealth gap, then it should be no surprise that the wealth gap has ballooned and not closed as often perceived. Shrinking HBCU alumni pools are a major factor for this growing gap. An increased pressure in the coming generation will be present as alumni of HBCUs are more likely to graduate with student loan debt and higher student loads making it even harder for development offices to ask for contributions. Fiscal trends are not currently in HBCUs favor unless a real turnaround happens among its ability to recruit more African American high school graduates. Currently, only 10-13 percent of African American high school graduates are choosing HBCUs. A problem compounded with African Americans having the lowest high school graduation rate in the country among all groups. The arms race to increase student bodies and in turn alumni pools is largely based on the aforementioned issues of alumni having less to give because of the student debt loads of the current generation of graduates. There are of course other factors, but at the very heart of this matter this can not be understated in the contribution to the widening gap between HWCU/HBCU endowments.