Tag Archives: college philanthropy

Abandoned By (Black) America: HBCU Endowments Less Than One Percent of American College Fortunes


A great nation cannot abandon its responsibilities. Responsibilities abandoned today return as more acute crises tomorrow. – Gerald Ford

fd52066c2d4faa21ca84c29f2cb62048

There are two houses and two families, we will call them the Smiths and Jacksons for the sake of this story, who are living next door to each other in a neighborhood. The Smith family in one household are preparing for a feast as it seems they do every night. Meanwhile, the Jackson family prepares their own feast, but just as they do every night at dinner they pack all their food up and walk next door to their neighbors home and knock on the door. The Smiths open the door as always with a smile and greet their neighbors and take the food they fixed and promptly slam the door in the Jacksons face. They add the food to their already illustrious feast without as much a second thought that they have more food than they need and that the Jacksons once again gave them all of their dinner. The Jackson family stands by an open window where they can smell the feast that they and the Smiths cooked as it sits on the Smiths’ table. Yet, they are offered nothing but the aroma. Eventually, the Jacksons return to their home starving and as every night goes, one of the children ask the parents, “Why do we give them our food when we have a table here to eat our food on?” At which time the parents always reply, “Because our food taste better on their table,” to their children who eventually will feed their malnourished and lean bodies with the bread and water they always receive after this affair. The children confused by this statement from their parents further inquire how do they know it taste better on the Smiths table. Their parents tell them of a time when they were allowed to sit at the Smiths’ back door and have a taste of the food and it definitely tasted better. The Jackson parents insisted it had to be because of the Smiths’ beautiful table, even though the food came from their kitchen. Then the children as they always do plead with their parents to allow them to keep the dinner tomorrow so that they can grow to be big and strong and one day they will be able to build all the fine things their parents see in the Smiths’ window. However, the parents tell them that when the Smiths cut wood for their home they cut it better than they did, that when they build furniture they build it finer because they have better tools, and when they serve drinks their drinks taste better because of course, their ice is colder. So the Jacksons continue to resound to every night giving their dinner away in hopes of one day being allowed to eat their own food at another’s table. And so has been the relationship to African America and its own institutions.

Over the past 60 years, African America has, save for the black church, been on an expedited exodus from supporting, building, and controlling its own institutions for the colder ice of their neighbors in the hopes that they would one day be allowed to sit at their neighbors’ table. This despite during the post-antebellum period up until World War II when African America started, controlled, owned, and supported institutions of commerce, education, politics, health, and more all within their own municipalities. Five hundred hospitals at one point, one hundred boarding schools, thousands of businesses, and yes over one hundred what we know today as Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Now, that first seventy some years of blacksmithmanship that built these institutions after the Civil War has been replaced by a culture of abandonment over the past sixty years.

In a recent article, Forbes highlights the institutional wealth disparity that exist within United States higher education institutions. A national system that comprises approximately 3 000 colleges and universities across the country have a combined endowment value of $500 billion. Yet, at HBCUs who comprise approximately three percent of the nation’s college and universities have combined endowments of roughly $2.5 billion or 0.5 percent, while 30 colleges/universities with the largest endowments hold $260 billion of the pie or 52 percent. Yes, 30 colleges have more in endowments than 2 970 colleges and universities combined and over 100 times the amount one hundred HBCUs hold in their coffers. HBCU endowments are not even representative of their representation. Who is to blame for such an anemic number? Well, ironically if you ask many African Americans they will lay the blame at the feet of HBCUs and the alumni who attended them for not giving back as they should. The irony of course being that ninety percent of African Americans who attend college today choose to do so at non-HBCUs. At the University of Phoenix, a for-profit college, almost twenty percent of its 213 000 student body is African American. An amount equal to roughly ten percent of the entire HBCU student population. This despite the University of Phoenix’s degrees not being worth the paper they are printed on, but they are not a Black institution so therefore it must be a better education, right? Never mind the percent of African Americans who decide to attend elite PWIs and take their intellectual capital out of the African American ecosystem. We are quite literally using our intellectual capital to build others research and academic prowess and deepening the institutional gap between African America and the rest of America.

The economic cost of abandonment by African American to HBCUs is hard to put an accurate figure on because the $125 that the African American graduate in 1969 did not donate to an HBCU and a bunch of probability factors would require a doctoral thesis and years of research, but an abstract analysis is possible. To note, for every $125 in 1969 that had been invested in the stock market with traditional returns would be worth just under $23 000 today, which in a moment you will see the relevance. Currently, there are approximately 20 million Americans in college, African America comprises 3 million of that population, and 2.7 million of that 3 million attend non-HBCUs. The average annual cost of college in the United States is $22 000 annually, valuing African America’s tuition revenue at $66 billion annually, but $59.4 billion of it is in non-HBCUs. HBCUs as a whole receive only 1.5 percent of America’s total current tuition revenue pie. When it comes philanthropy, numbers are even starker. In 2015, HBCUs received only 4 of the 530 donations (0.7 percent) that were $1 million or more to colleges and universities. Those four donations totaled $7 million, while the the top four to non-HBCUs combined for $950 million. The latter being an amount equal to almost 40 percent of HBCU endowments combined. Yes, in one year, four donations to HWCU/PWIs equalled almost half of what has taken HBCUs over one hundred years to accumulate.

Philanthropy for colleges ultimately boils down to two things. Either have a very large alumni base or produce very wealth alumni who procure their money through high-paying professions or entrepreneurial pursuits. The first sometimes increases the odds of the second, but there are certainly other factors as well. However, the first is the easiest to ensure a larger endowment just based on statistics. Inside Higher Education reported, “The participation rate in 2014 was 8.3 percent, compared to 8.7 percent in 2013. At private liberal arts colleges, which as a group always have higher alumni giving rates, about 20 percent of alumni donate.” That means that overall, out of every 100 students who attend college, eight of them will be active donors. A number that swings widely depending on the engagement of the school’s development office, alumni associations, etc. Or in the current case of the estimated 300 000 students at HBCUs, only 24 000 of them are likely donors. Yet, obviously if instead of only ten percent of African American students attended HBCUs, ninety percent did, then you would have alumni donor pool of 216 000 or nine times greater.

HBCUs must go for numbers because over the past sixty years as we abandoned our institutions (except the church) our wealth also plummeted post World War II. As a result today, African American median wealth according to the Laura Chin via the U.S. Census, “In absolute terms, the median white household had $111,146 in wealth holdings in 2011, compared to $7,113 for the median black household and $8,348 for the median Latino household.” The melancholy of HBCUs primary donor pool suffers the compounding impact of being sixteen times poorer and attracting only 1 out of 10 of the population it was built to serve coupled with only eight percent of the 1 out of 10 giving back. That means in essence over the past thirty years, less than one percent of African Americans who attended college from all colleges will have donated to an HBCU. A somber reality no matter how you look at it. Especially when you are trying to maximize the dollar given to have the most impact on African America.

However, recent events have shown there might be a resurgence in the long-term outlook for HBCU endowments. African American owned banks and credit unions have seen a resurgence as millions in deposits have poured back into their coffers as African America looks to gain more control over their communities. In recent years, HBCUs like Morehouse, Claflin, and Langston University have seen record breaking numbers of freshmen classes. This will only bode well for the future of that eight percent donor pool and the probability of $1 million or more donors as African America is creating more businesses than any other group in America currently, a key to wealth creation. The past 60 years may have been the dark ages for HBCUs and their endowments, but a new golden age maybe on the horizon indeed. It maybe time to set that dinner table after all.

Paving the Road to Sustainable Alumni Support for HBCUs


philanthropy-reframed

“Philanthropy without scale and sustainability is like any other bad business that will simply wither and die on the vine.” – Naveen Jain

Since 1837 historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) have played a vital role educating students. Prominent activists and scholars including Nikki Giovanni, Toni Morrison and Thurgood Marshall benefited from attending HBCUs with supportive environments. The emphasis on cultural pride, scholarship and political acumen transform the lives of students from underserved communities. In comparison to predominantly White institutions (PWIs), HBCUs enroll more underserved, first generation and minority students. Upon their arrival on campus students are surrounded by majestic trees, serene suburban landscapes or colorful urban enclaves. However, despite their idyllic settings HBCUs are at a crossroads. The closing of Saint Paul’s College in 2013, Morris Brown College’s bankruptcy filing in 2012, Lewis College of Business uncertain status, and nine other HBCU closings over the years highlight the fragility of HBCUs in through the years into the present. Ensuring our institutions remain viable is predicated on the financial support of alumni, administrators, faculty, stakeholders, students and trustees.

Dramatically increasing donations to HBCUs would alleviate the financial strain that has plagued prominent institutions including South Carolina State and Grambling State University. Unfortunately several factors have contributed to the financial crisis at HBCUs including: inequitable funding, shifting federal and state policies and limited alumni contributions. To the last point, HBCU Money found that only 1 out of the 559 $1 million or over donations to colleges in 2013 and 9 out of the 517 $1 million or over donations in 2014 to colleges went to HBCUs.  Although HBCU alumni are among the most dedicated graduates they are more likely to come from underserved communities and leave with more loan debt in comparison to students from larger PWIs. The stark difference between HBCUs and PWIs regarding alumni contributions and endowments is problematic. For example, Harvard University’s estimated $30 billion endowment far exceeds Howard University’s estimated $586 million endowment. Pundits would argue that comparing Harvard and Howard is unfair; however, the funding gap reflects the uphill battle HBCUs have encountered since their inception.

While HBCUs face challenges overcoming fiscal crisis, the Black community has always worked together collectively to avert financial disaster. For instance, the efforts of alumni and students at South Carolina State highlight the importance of exerting political pressure to ensure our institutions remain open – political capital that is a lot easier to build and exert if the community wielded more economic power. Despite the trials and tribulations HBCUs are allying with supporters to challenge the non-HBCU owned media’s deficit orientated focus. Increasingly administrators and alumni are taking steps to change the narrative regarding HBCUs focusing on their history fighting for Civil Rights. The renewed emphasis on social justice and growth of social media could become a rallying point for stakeholders. Recently, HBCU alumni have raised money to increase institutional aid for students from underserved communities.

The I Love Howard campaign is an example how HBCU graduates are using social media and grassroots efforts to galvanize graduates. Led by Howard University alumnae Michelle Jayne, Jessica Neal and Rochee Jeffrey the campaign is making strides engaging alumni and supporters to protect Howard’s legacy. Ensuring post-secondary institutions including Howard have networks that are fighting for increased funding could turn the tide for HBCUs. For instance, fundraisers, online telethons, social media campaigns, after work mixers and private/public partnerships are practical options for alumni.

Encouraging students to identify conventional or unconventional methods to increase donations should begin freshman year. Campaigns that urge students to give as little as $1 highlight the important role donations play in sustaining critical programs. Without support from alumni HBCUs are susceptible to cuts in federal and state funding that hamper efforts to recruit talented students. Schools including Claflin University recognize increasing donations is linked to the institutions future success.

Claflin, 2015’s HBCU of the Year, received funding from the Kresge Foundation and the United Negro College Fund to strengthen fundraising efforts. Claflin designed a campaign encouraging alumni, faculty, parents and students to donate. In 2013, the alumni giving rate increased nearly 10% from 43% to 52%. This year the university announced they raised nearly $90 million for phase one of the capital campaign. The success of Claflin underscores the commitment from supporters. HBCUs with a low alumni giving rate should use Claflin as a template to increase overall support. Strengthening HBCUs through campaigns can fund endowments, repair and renovate dilapidated facilities and recruit students.

Ensuring HBCUs continue their mission educating African American students is linked to financial support from alumni and students. Although HBCUs enroll more students from underserved communities in comparison to PWIs they are equipped to encourage alumni to provide critical funding. For example, Black greek letter organizations, concerts, football classics, homecoming and regional alumni events present opportunities to reach out to newly minted graduates. In addition, developing partnerships with African American (and African if they are really ambitious) corporations and philanthropic organizations are important for institutions dependent on external funding. The future for HBCUs is bright, but increased donations will ensure they develop a new cadre of entrepreneurs,  Nobel Laureates and Pulitzer Prize winners.

America’s 2014 Top 10 College Donations


rongeraldchan

In the world of philanthropy there are two types of donors that development offices love. High-quality donors who give consistently and over their lifetime will probably give six to seven figures of donations. Often these donors leave the bulk of their donation through their estate. The second are transformative donors who can change the paradigm of an entire institution with one donation. These donors are masters of their universe with the wealth and power they wield and often the barons of their particular industry. Donations from transformative donors range from eight to nine figures.

The 2014 top donors definitely saw a pull back from their 2013 giving. Combined donations came in $500 million lighter than last year. However, this year was led by two brothers, Ronald and Gerald Chan (pictured above), who donated $350 million to Harvard’s School of Public Health.  Their donation is equal to 10 percent of Harvard’s endowment, which still is the world’s largest college and university endowment.

ABOUT THE DONATIONS:

Total Giving Combined – $2.0 Billion

Median Donation – $60 Million

Average Donation -$79.4 Million

The combined donations are equal to all HBCU endowments combined.

ABOUT THE DONORS:

Total Net Worth Combined – $42.8 Billion reported

Median Net Worth – $2.2 Billion reported

Average Net Worth – $4.3 Billion reported

This year was extremely geographically diverse with 16 different states being represented. California, New York, and Illinois all tied for three apiece.

1. Morningside Foundation (Gerald & Ronald Chan) – $350 Million
Recipient: Harvard School of Public Health
Source of Wealth: Family wealth, Finance, Investments
Net Worth: $2.4 Billion

2. Kenneth C. Griffin – $150 Million
Recipient: Harvard University
Source of Wealth: Finance
Net Worth: $6.5 Billion

T3. Fred Eshelman – $100 Million
Recipient: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Eshelman School of Pharmacy
Source of Wealth: Health products
Net Worth: N/A

T3. Anonymous – $100 Million
Recipient: Oregon Health & Science University Foundation
Source of Wealth: N/A
Net Worth: N/A

T3. Anonymous – $100 Million
Recipient: Dartmouth College
Source of Wealth: N/A
Net Worth: N/A

T4. David Rockefeller – $75 Million
Recipient: Rockefeller University
Source of Wealth: Family wealth, Finance
Net Worth: $3 Billion

T4. John W. Jordan II – $75 Million
Recipient: University of Notre Dame
Source of Wealth: Finance
Net Worth: N/A

T4. Alfred C. Warrington IV & Judy Warrington – $75 Million
Recipient: University of Florida, Warrington College of Business Administration
Source of Wealth: Industry
Net Worth: N/A

T4. Sandra & Edward Meyer Foundation – $75 Million
Recipient: Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Source of Wealth: Advertising
Net Worth: N/A

5. Jay H. Shidler – $69 Million
Recipient: University of Hawaii Foundation
Source of Wealth: Investments, Real Estate
Net Worth: $700 Million

T6. Charles T. Munger – $65 Million
Recipient: University of California – Santa Barbara
Source of Wealth: Investments
Net Worth: $1.3 Billion

T6. Albert P. Viragh (deceased) – $65 Million
Recipient: John Hopkins Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center
Source of Wealth: Finance, Investments
Net Worth: N/A

T7. Vanier Family – $60 Million
Recipient: Kansas State University
Source of Wealth: Agriculture
Net Worth: N/A

T7. Mulva Family Foundation (James & Miriam Mulva) – $60 Million
Recipient: University of Texas at Austin
Source of Wealth: Energy, Oil
Net Worth: N/A

8. Madison and Lila Reetz Self – $58 Million
Recipient: University of Kansas
Source of Wealth: Chemicals, Finance
Net Worth: N/A

9. Kavitark & Vidjealatchoumy Shriram – $57 Million
Recipient: Stanford University
Source of Wealth: Technology
Net Worth: $1.9 Billion

T10. Ronald & Eileen Weiser – $50 Million
Recipient: University of Michigan at Ann Arbor
Source of Wealth: Real estate
Net Worth: N/A

T10. Steve & Connie Ballmer – $50 Million
Recipient: University of Oregon
Source of Wealth: Technology
Net Worth: $20.6 Billion

T10. David & Cheryl Strauss Einhorn – $50 Million
Recipient: Cornell University
Source of Wealth: Finance
Net Worth: $2 Billion

T10. Donald (deceased) & Marilyn Keough – $50 Million
Recipient: University of Notre Dame
Source of Wealth: Food and beverage
Net Worth: N/A

T10. Jimmy Haslam – $50 Million
Recipient: University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Source of Wealth: Family wealth, Retail
Net Worth: $2.8 Billion

T10. Agnes Nelms Haury – $50 Million
Recipient: University of Arizona Foundation
Source of Wealth: Family wealth
Net Worth: N/A

T10. Thomas Kline – $50 Million
Recipient: Drexel University, Thomas R. Kline School of Law
Source of Wealth: Law
Net Worth: N/A

T10. Norm Asbjornson – $50 Million
Recipient: Montana State University
Source of Wealth: Manufacturing
Net Worth: N/A

T10. Gary K. Michelson – $50 Million
Recipient: University of Southern California
Source of Wealth: Health care, Invention
Net Worth: $1.6 Billion